APSCo UK Blog

APSCo welcomes focus on umbrella due diligence, but warns more needs to be done

Written by APSCo United Kingdom | Apr 18, 2024 11:15:00 AM

 

Responding to today’s announcement that the government is looking into a statutory due diligence scheme for umbrella company use, the Association of Professional Staffing Companies has welcomed the push for greater compliance, but warns the problem is complex, making further action necessary.

As Tania Bowers, Global Public Policy Director at APSCo, explained, clear definitions and licensing of the umbrella sector are needed:

It’s unfortunate that the minority of firms that are offering non-compliant umbrella solutions are creating headaches like this for policy makers and those firms that offer legitimate solutions to workers and businesses alike. We certainly welcome the news that HMRC is pushing ahead with a focus on due diligence to clampdown on unscrupulous behaviour, however the problem is multi-faceted and isn’t simple to resolve.

As we highlighted in our initial consultation response, the definition of umbrella companies needs more clarity and should also allow for marketplace evolution. The announcement today doesn’t, in our view, address this.

While we expect that umbrella compliance will be an on-going mantra for HMRC and regulation will evolve as a result, APSCo remains steadfast in its view that any proposals should not place more liability or obligations on recruiters.


There are no barriers to entry to the umbrella market, which means that setting up a corporate entity and launching an umbrella company can be done in a matter of days. We believe that a licencing or registration process is required with EAS or another body, in recognition that financial wrongdoing is the largest risk to workers and the supply chain. Further, industry self-regulation should be replaced with statutory compliance codes for the umbrella sector itself.

APSCo members do overall support enshrining due diligence in regulation as a first step as this will immediately lead to a more level playing field. However, they don’t think it’s the most effective route to stop tax non-compliance.